Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Monjeau Peak, Revisited


Here's the "after":

"October, Monjeau Peak" 12x16, pastel - 2013

and here's the "before":

"October, Monjeau Peak" 12x16, pastel - 2003
And now here's the story behind this metamorphosis....


One of my favorite spots in all of southern New Mexico is Monjeau Peak, high in the White Mountain Wilderness near Ruidoso.   Access is by a twisty, windy dirt road that goes uphill steeply to a stone lookout tower built by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s.  The lookout is at 9500 feet, and from here you have sweeping views of aspen-dotted alpine meadows and 12,000-foot Sierra Blanca.  Many beautiful trails wander over the meadows and beyond.

I should perhaps use past tense in the above paragraph. In July 2012, the lightning-sparked Little Bear Fire burned over 44,000 acres and 254 buildings.  The lookout tower was burned, but the structure remains and will be rebuilt; I believe Monjeau Peak is still closed at this time.


We camped there one fall ten years ago, in a little aspen grove.  While hiking, I became enamoured of the rock boulders that were scattered around.  They made fascinating, beautiful compositions with the fall colors.  I felt compelled to paint them.


I did a studio piece in pastel, which at the time I was very proud of.  I had it framed - quite expensively.  Not long after that, in a workshop with Albert Handell, I had an opportunity to share a slide of the piece with Albert and the group at our critique night.  When the slide flashed up on the wall, Albert exclaimed, "Oy, those rocks!' and suggested that I spend a year painting rocks.  (Which I did.)

As I got better at the craft of painting, I became increasingly dissatisfied with this piece.  Even so, I've dragged the painting around from home to home over the years, and I've kept it hanging on the wall for students and visitors to see.  Why?  For the silly reason that it cost so much to frame.  I suppose I could have replaced the pastel with a newer one, but I had it in my mind that there was something fundamentally good about the piece, and that someday I would "fix it."

There were a number of problems with it.  For one, the mountain in the distance seemed to end abruptly behind a big fir tree; it should have continued on.  For another, the rocks were all evenly-lit, and there was no real focal point among them.  And of course, the rocks themselves, in all their pink-and-purple glory, needed to be pulled back from Cartoonland to reality.

This week, ten years later, I decided to deal with it.  I love pastel because the surface is always "open."  That is, you can go back to work on it at any time without having to treat it in any way.  (With oil, the surface becomes "closed" after a few days, and you either have to "oil out" or use retouch varnish, neither of which is really very satisfactory.)  I unframed it, taped it to a board, found the very same photo I had used originally, and went to work.

I'm much happier with the piece now, and it will go back into its frame later today.

Here are some detail shots, plus one of the painting in its frame:






11 comments:

Pam Short said...

Michael,

Thanks so much for sharing your before and after of your painting as well as your critique.


Pam

Michael Chesley Johnson said...

My pleasure, Pam!

Becky Whight said...

Wow, what a difference. I also like how you changed the value/color of the trees. Becky

Michael Chesley Johnson said...

Thanks, Becky!

Donna T said...

Thanks very much, Michael! Albert should see this now! Those rocks are gorgeous.

Michael Chesley Johnson said...

Thank you, Donna!

Mary Rochelle said...

I love your use of broken color, everything has so much more dimension now. The original version looks flat in comparison. Funny, how such a simple thing as continuing the hill in the background can impact the quality of the painting so much. Your rocks are authentic and wonderfully stated. Gorgeous piece, Michael!

Michael Chesley Johnson said...

Thank you, Mary!

cabinart said...

Love the light on the rocks and the greater degree of realism.

Thanks for showing the before and after and explaining the rationale.

If you had shown the "new and improved" version to someone who doesn't like realism, you might have been told to spice up the color, to not be so bound to reality. Sigh. We need to choose whom we listen to carefully!

from Felicia Barnes said...

Thank you for sharing this with us. It is encouraging to me, to see how you have grown and your work has progressed. I am still at the beginning and needed that reminder to keep going, that it takes awhile but I can get there. Thank you for continuing to blog and share with us your journey. It gives great pleasure to see your beautiful work and learn from a master.

Michael Chesley Johnson said...

Thank you very much, cabinart and Felicia!